Editorial Policy

This page documents how Spec Coding produces, reviews, corrects, and monetizes content. It exists so readers can evaluate the trustworthiness of the information and understand who is responsible for it.

1. Who Is Responsible for This Content

All articles, guides, and templates on Spec Coding are maintained under the responsibility of Daniel Marsh, the site's lead author and editor. Background, public profiles, and claim boundaries are listed on the author page.

There are no anonymous contributors. If content is ever contributed by a guest author, that author will be named, linked, and their background disclosed on the relevant page. Company and customer details in examples are anonymized unless the source is public.

2. Topic Selection

Topics are selected based on two criteria:

Topics are never selected based on advertiser preference, affiliate relationships, or commercial agreements of any kind. Spec Coding does not accept paid content requests.

3. Research and Writing Standards

Every article is drafted from the author's direct engineering experience or from documented industry practice. Before publication, each article is reviewed against the following checklist:

4. Corrections and Updates

Spec Coding treats corrections as a first-class editorial obligation, not an afterthought.

1

Report — Send a correction through the contact page or by email. Include the specific claim, the article URL, and your suggested correction or source.

2

Review — The author reviews the reported issue within 5 business days. If additional research is needed, the review may take longer, and the reporter will receive an acknowledgment.

3

Update — If the report is verified, the article is corrected and the dateModified metadata is updated. Corrections that materially change the article's advice are noted at the top of the relevant section or in the site changelog.

4

Proactive review — Articles covering tools, platforms, or API behaviors are periodically reviewed when the underlying technology publishes significant changes, even without a reader report.

5. Advertising and Commercial Disclosure

Spec Coding may display advertising, including Google AdSense, to support site hosting and content maintenance costs. The following disclosures apply:

Ad placement boundaries, accidental-click prevention, and reader reporting steps are documented in the Advertising Policy.

6. Content Removal

Content is removed or unpublished in the following circumstances:

Removed pages redirect to the closest relevant current content. Permanent removal without a redirect is avoided to prevent broken links in external citations.

7. Use of AI Tools

Spec Coding uses AI tools as writing aids during content production. Transparency about this is part of the site's editorial standards.

8. Linking Policy

External links in Spec Coding articles point to primary sources: official documentation, specification documents, or original research. Links are not added for SEO reciprocity or as part of any link exchange arrangement. All external links use rel="noopener" for security.

9. Page-Level Quality Review

Core pages are reviewed for practical usefulness, not just grammar or search visibility. A page should make clear who it helps, what decision it supports, what artifact or checklist the reader can use next, and how the advice should be adapted for different risk levels.

When a page appears thin or low-value, the first fix is to add concrete material: examples, decision rules, failure modes, review questions, stronger next steps, or clearer editorial accountability. Spec Coding does not add generic filler to satisfy word count thresholds.

10. Contact for Policy Questions

For questions about this editorial policy, requests for corrections, or concerns about a specific article, use the contact page or email [email protected]. Editorial messages are reviewed within three business days.

Last updated: April 29, 2026 · Author: Daniel Marsh · Change log: Site Changelog